Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46(3): 101-106
Published online September 30, 2024
https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.3.101
© Korean Academy of Dental Technology
박수철, 박종경
김천대학교 치기공학과
Soo-Chul Park , Jong-Kyoung Park
Department of Dental Technology, College of Health Care, Gimcheon University, Gimcheon, Korea
Correspondence to :
Jong-Kyoung Park
Department of Dental Technology, College of Health Care, Gimcheon University, 214 Daehak-ro, Gimcheon 39528, Korea
E-mail: jkpark@gimcheon.ac.kr
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7508-7823
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: This study evaluated the potential of a vacuum-brazed dental diamond dresser as an alternative to commercially available electroplated diamond dressers and assess its suitability for clinical use.
Methods: Commercially available electroplated diamond dressers were selected as the control group (n=5), whereas vacuum-brazed diamond dressers with 80 grit and 100 grit particles were fabricated as the experimental groups (n=5 each). Prepared specimens were evaluated for surface roughness, wear resistance, and abrasiveness against a wear-inducing element (ZrO2 ball). The results were reported as means and standard deviations. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test using SPSS Statistics ver. 23.0 (IBM), with the significance level set at 0.05.
Results: Surface roughness was highest in the 80 grit group (23.99±3.62 μm) followed by the 100 grit group (20.38±1.79 μm) and the control group (17.59±0.56 μm). Wear resistance was greatest in the control group (0.0060±0.0009 g) followed by the 80 grit group (0.0018±0.0003 g) and the 100 grit group (0.0013±0.0001 g). Abrasiveness against the ZrO2 ball was highest in the 80 grit group (0.120±0.007 g) followed by the 100 grit group (0.101±0.007 g) and the control group (0.086±0.004 g).
Conclusion: This study offers key insights for enhancing the performance of diamond dressers through vacuum-brazing and is expected to aid in the development of more efficient and durable diamond dressers for future applications.
Keywords: Dental equipment, Dental instruments, Materials testing
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46(3): 101-106
Published online September 30, 2024 https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.3.101
Copyright © Korean Academy of Dental Technology.
박수철, 박종경
김천대학교 치기공학과
Soo-Chul Park , Jong-Kyoung Park
Department of Dental Technology, College of Health Care, Gimcheon University, Gimcheon, Korea
Correspondence to:Jong-Kyoung Park
Department of Dental Technology, College of Health Care, Gimcheon University, 214 Daehak-ro, Gimcheon 39528, Korea
E-mail: jkpark@gimcheon.ac.kr
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7508-7823
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: This study evaluated the potential of a vacuum-brazed dental diamond dresser as an alternative to commercially available electroplated diamond dressers and assess its suitability for clinical use.
Methods: Commercially available electroplated diamond dressers were selected as the control group (n=5), whereas vacuum-brazed diamond dressers with 80 grit and 100 grit particles were fabricated as the experimental groups (n=5 each). Prepared specimens were evaluated for surface roughness, wear resistance, and abrasiveness against a wear-inducing element (ZrO2 ball). The results were reported as means and standard deviations. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test using SPSS Statistics ver. 23.0 (IBM), with the significance level set at 0.05.
Results: Surface roughness was highest in the 80 grit group (23.99±3.62 μm) followed by the 100 grit group (20.38±1.79 μm) and the control group (17.59±0.56 μm). Wear resistance was greatest in the control group (0.0060±0.0009 g) followed by the 80 grit group (0.0018±0.0003 g) and the 100 grit group (0.0013±0.0001 g). Abrasiveness against the ZrO2 ball was highest in the 80 grit group (0.120±0.007 g) followed by the 100 grit group (0.101±0.007 g) and the control group (0.086±0.004 g).
Conclusion: This study offers key insights for enhancing the performance of diamond dressers through vacuum-brazing and is expected to aid in the development of more efficient and durable diamond dressers for future applications.
Keywords: Dental equipment, Dental instruments, Materials testing
Soo-Chul Park, Jong-Kyoung Park
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46(3): 107-113 https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.3.107