Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46(3): 107-113
Published online September 30, 2024
https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.3.107
© Korean Academy of Dental Technology
박수철, 박종경
김천대학교 치기공학과
Soo-Chul Park , Jong-Kyoung Park
Department of Dental Technology, College of Health Care, Gimcheon University, Gimcheon, Korea
Correspondence to :
Jong-Kyoung Park
Department of Dental Technology, College of Health Care, Gimcheon University, 214 Daehak-ro, Gimcheon 39528, Korea
E-mail: jkpark@gimcheon.ac.kr
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7508-7823
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: This study aimed to develop dental alumina ceramic dressers, evaluate their abrasive wear characteristics based on particle size, and identify dental dressers with optimal particle size and performance.
Methods: Commercial ceramic dressers (n=5) were selected as the control group, whereas alumina ceramic dressers with 80-grit and 120-grit particles were fabricated as the experimental groups (n=5 each). Prepared specimens were assessed for surface roughness, wear resistance, and abrasiveness against a wear-inducing element (SUS304 stainless steel ball). Means and standard deviations were calculated for each test. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis H test with Bonferroni correction (α=0.05) via SPSS Statistics ver. 23.0 (IBM).
Results: Surface roughness was highest in the 80-grit group (22.734±1.308 μm), followed by 120-grit group (21.804±0.785 μm), and lowest in control group (15.782±0.223 μm). Wear resistance was greatest in 120-grit group (0.007±0.002 g), followed by the 80-grit group (0.007±0.004 g), and lowest in the control group (0.370±0.010 g). Furthermore, abrasiveness against the wear-inducing element (SUS304 stainless steel ball) was highest in 120-grit group (0.017±0.003 g), followed by the 80-grit group (0.015±0.003 g), and lowest in control group (0.010±0.001 g).
Conclusion: Based on the combined results of surface roughness, wear resistance, and abrasiveness against a wear-inducing element, the newly developed alumina ceramic dressers show promise for clinical application.
Keywords: Alumina ceramic, Dental equipment, Dental instruments, Materials testing, Particle size
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46(3): 107-113
Published online September 30, 2024 https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.3.107
Copyright © Korean Academy of Dental Technology.
박수철, 박종경
김천대학교 치기공학과
Soo-Chul Park , Jong-Kyoung Park
Department of Dental Technology, College of Health Care, Gimcheon University, Gimcheon, Korea
Correspondence to:Jong-Kyoung Park
Department of Dental Technology, College of Health Care, Gimcheon University, 214 Daehak-ro, Gimcheon 39528, Korea
E-mail: jkpark@gimcheon.ac.kr
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7508-7823
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: This study aimed to develop dental alumina ceramic dressers, evaluate their abrasive wear characteristics based on particle size, and identify dental dressers with optimal particle size and performance.
Methods: Commercial ceramic dressers (n=5) were selected as the control group, whereas alumina ceramic dressers with 80-grit and 120-grit particles were fabricated as the experimental groups (n=5 each). Prepared specimens were assessed for surface roughness, wear resistance, and abrasiveness against a wear-inducing element (SUS304 stainless steel ball). Means and standard deviations were calculated for each test. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis H test with Bonferroni correction (α=0.05) via SPSS Statistics ver. 23.0 (IBM).
Results: Surface roughness was highest in the 80-grit group (22.734±1.308 μm), followed by 120-grit group (21.804±0.785 μm), and lowest in control group (15.782±0.223 μm). Wear resistance was greatest in 120-grit group (0.007±0.002 g), followed by the 80-grit group (0.007±0.004 g), and lowest in the control group (0.370±0.010 g). Furthermore, abrasiveness against the wear-inducing element (SUS304 stainless steel ball) was highest in 120-grit group (0.017±0.003 g), followed by the 80-grit group (0.015±0.003 g), and lowest in control group (0.010±0.001 g).
Conclusion: Based on the combined results of surface roughness, wear resistance, and abrasiveness against a wear-inducing element, the newly developed alumina ceramic dressers show promise for clinical application.
Keywords: Alumina ceramic, Dental equipment, Dental instruments, Materials testing, Particle size
Soo-Chul Park, Jong-Kyoung Park
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46(3): 101-106 https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.3.101