Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2019; 41(4): 287-293
Published online December 30, 2019
https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2019.41.4.287
© Korean Academy of Dental Technology
장연;
진주보건대학교 치기공과;
Jang, Yeon;
Department of Dental Technology, Jinju Health College;
Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of the 3D printed die models and to investigate its clinical applicability. Methods: Stone die models were fabricated from conventional impressions(stone die model; SDM, n=7). 3D virtual models obtained from the digital impressions were manufactured as a 3D printed die models using a 3D printer(3D printed die models;3DM, n=7). Reference model, stone die models and 3D printed die models were scanned with a reference scanner. All dies model dataset were superimposed with the reference model file by the "Best fit alignment" method using 3D analysis software. Statistical analysis was performed using the independent t-test and 2-way ANOVA (α=.05). Results: The RMS value of the 3D printed die model was significantly larger than the RMS value of the stone die model (P<.001). As a result of 2-way ANOVA, significant differences were found between the model group (P<.001) and the part (P<.001), and their interaction effects (P<.001). Conclusion: The 3D printed die model showed lower accuracy than the stone die model. Therefore, it is necessary to further improve the performance of 3D printer in order to apply the 3D printed model in prosthodontics.
Keywords: Intra-oral scanner,Precision,Trueness,3D analysis,3D printer,
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2019; 41(4): 287-293
Published online December 30, 2019 https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2019.41.4.287
Copyright © Korean Academy of Dental Technology.
장연;
진주보건대학교 치기공과;
Jang, Yeon;
Department of Dental Technology, Jinju Health College;
Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of the 3D printed die models and to investigate its clinical applicability. Methods: Stone die models were fabricated from conventional impressions(stone die model; SDM, n=7). 3D virtual models obtained from the digital impressions were manufactured as a 3D printed die models using a 3D printer(3D printed die models;3DM, n=7). Reference model, stone die models and 3D printed die models were scanned with a reference scanner. All dies model dataset were superimposed with the reference model file by the "Best fit alignment" method using 3D analysis software. Statistical analysis was performed using the independent t-test and 2-way ANOVA (α=.05). Results: The RMS value of the 3D printed die model was significantly larger than the RMS value of the stone die model (P<.001). As a result of 2-way ANOVA, significant differences were found between the model group (P<.001) and the part (P<.001), and their interaction effects (P<.001). Conclusion: The 3D printed die model showed lower accuracy than the stone die model. Therefore, it is necessary to further improve the performance of 3D printer in order to apply the 3D printed model in prosthodontics.
Keywords: Intra-oral scanner,Precision,Trueness,3D analysis,3D printer,
Table 1 . Accuracy (trueness and precision) of the stone and 3D printed die model groups (trueness [n = 7], precision [n = 21])..
group | Trueness | Precision |
---|---|---|
RMS (μm) (mean ± SD) | ||
Stone die model(SDM) | 15.1± 1.9 | 14.4± 1.1 |
3D printed die model(3DM) | 52.2± 3.2 | 29.5± 5.2 |
.001 | .001 |
Table 2 . Trueness of the stone and 3D printed die model groups for occlusal, axial and marginal part (n=7)..
Part | Stone die model (SDM) | 3D printed die model(3DM) | |
---|---|---|---|
RMS (μm) (mean ± SD) | |||
Occlusal | 15.2 ± 1.2a | 30.6 ± 4a | |
Axial | 16.4 ±1.3b | 44.7 ± 4.8b | |
Marginal | 27.9 ± 2.3c | 53.3 ± 1.4c | |