닫기

Ex) Article Title, Author, Keywords

Original Article

Split Viewer

Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46(1): 8-14

Published online March 30, 2024

https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.1.8

© Korean Academy of Dental Technology

광중합형 프린터로 제작한 임시 의치용 인공치아의 UV형 초음파 세척에 따른 선형측정 평가

김동연1, 이광영2

1경동대학교 치기공학과, 2원광보건대학교 치기공과

Received: March 13, 2024; Revised: March 17, 2024; Accepted: March 18, 2024

Linear measurement evaluation according to UV-type ultrasonic cleaning of artificial teeth for temporary dentures manufactured using a light-curing type printer produced by a DLP printer

Dong-Yeon Kim1 , Gwang-Young Lee2

1Department of Dental Technology, Kyungdong University, Wonju, Korea
2Department of Dental Laboratory Technology, Wonkwang Health Science University, Iksan, Korea

Correspondence to :
Gwang-Young Lee
Department of Dental Laboratory Technology, Wonkwang Health Science University, 514 Iksan-daero, Iksan 54538, Korea
E-mail: leegy@wu.ac.kr
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1826-6870

Received: March 13, 2024; Revised: March 17, 2024; Accepted: March 18, 2024

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose: This study compares the deformation of traditional resin dentures to resin dentures printed with digital light processing (DLP).
Methods: Eleven edentulous research models were developed. Ten of them were made with traditional resin dentures. The remaining one was prepared for scanning and 3D (three-dimensional) printing. Ten traditional resin dentures were made, with the remaining artificial teeth created using 3D software and a DLP printer. Traditional resin dentures, 3D-printed resin denture artificial teeth, and a denture base with artificial teeth were all cleaned simultaneously in an ultrasonic cleaner for 3 minutes. Three groups were assigned four artificial tooth measurement points, which were then measured with digital calipers. The measured data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The significance test was conducted using a nonparametric test Kruskal-Wallis test due to the small number of specimens (α=0.05).
Results: The traditional resin dentures had the lowest strain rate at –0.04%, while the group that manufactured only artificial teeth had the highest strain rate at –0.09%. However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the 3 groups (p>0.05).
Conclusion: During ultraviolet-type ultrasonic cleaning, traditional resin dentures (TD group) and denture base with artificial teeth made of DLP (DD group) demonstrated stable durability, whereas the artificial teeth made of DLP (AD group) with only artificial teeth did not show a good deformation rate.

Keywords: Artificial tooth, Deformation, Dentures, Three-dimensional printing, Ultrasonic cleaner

Article

Original Article

Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46(1): 8-14

Published online March 30, 2024 https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.1.8

Copyright © Korean Academy of Dental Technology.

광중합형 프린터로 제작한 임시 의치용 인공치아의 UV형 초음파 세척에 따른 선형측정 평가

김동연1, 이광영2

1경동대학교 치기공학과, 2원광보건대학교 치기공과

Received: March 13, 2024; Revised: March 17, 2024; Accepted: March 18, 2024

Linear measurement evaluation according to UV-type ultrasonic cleaning of artificial teeth for temporary dentures manufactured using a light-curing type printer produced by a DLP printer

Dong-Yeon Kim1 , Gwang-Young Lee2

1Department of Dental Technology, Kyungdong University, Wonju, Korea
2Department of Dental Laboratory Technology, Wonkwang Health Science University, Iksan, Korea

Correspondence to:Gwang-Young Lee
Department of Dental Laboratory Technology, Wonkwang Health Science University, 514 Iksan-daero, Iksan 54538, Korea
E-mail: leegy@wu.ac.kr
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1826-6870

Received: March 13, 2024; Revised: March 17, 2024; Accepted: March 18, 2024

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose: This study compares the deformation of traditional resin dentures to resin dentures printed with digital light processing (DLP).
Methods: Eleven edentulous research models were developed. Ten of them were made with traditional resin dentures. The remaining one was prepared for scanning and 3D (three-dimensional) printing. Ten traditional resin dentures were made, with the remaining artificial teeth created using 3D software and a DLP printer. Traditional resin dentures, 3D-printed resin denture artificial teeth, and a denture base with artificial teeth were all cleaned simultaneously in an ultrasonic cleaner for 3 minutes. Three groups were assigned four artificial tooth measurement points, which were then measured with digital calipers. The measured data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The significance test was conducted using a nonparametric test Kruskal-Wallis test due to the small number of specimens (α=0.05).
Results: The traditional resin dentures had the lowest strain rate at –0.04%, while the group that manufactured only artificial teeth had the highest strain rate at –0.09%. However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the 3 groups (p>0.05).
Conclusion: During ultraviolet-type ultrasonic cleaning, traditional resin dentures (TD group) and denture base with artificial teeth made of DLP (DD group) demonstrated stable durability, whereas the artificial teeth made of DLP (AD group) with only artificial teeth did not show a good deformation rate.

Keywords: Artificial tooth, Deformation, Dentures, Three-dimensional printing, Ultrasonic cleaner

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Traditional denture base resin anterior and posterior artificial teeth.
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46: 8-14https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.1.8

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Traditional complete denture resin completed.
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46: 8-14https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.1.8

Fig 3.

Figure 3.Design artificial teeth and denture bases using computer-aided design software (Dental System 2020; 3Shape).
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46: 8-14https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.1.8

Fig 4.

Figure 4.Production using DLP printer. (A) Artificial teeth made of DLP. (B) Denture base with artificial teeth made of DLP. DLP: digital light processing.
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46: 8-14https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.1.8

Fig 5.

Figure 5.Cleaning using an ultrasonic cleaner teeth. (A) Traditional resin dentures. (B) Artificial teeth made of DLP. (C) Denture base with artificial teeth made of DLP. DLP: digital light processing.
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46: 8-14https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.1.8

Fig 6.

Figure 6.Linear measurement of complete denture artificial teeth. (A) TD group, (B) AD group, (C) DD group. TD: Traditional resin dentures, AD: artificial teeth made of digital light processing, DD: denture base with artificial teeth made of digital light processing.
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46: 8-14https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.1.8

Table 1 . Overall results after UV-type ultrasonic cleaning in 3 groups (n=10) (unit=%).

GroupMean±SDMedian95% CIp-value

MinMax
TD–0.04±0.46–0.13–0.160.070.272
AD–0.09±0.40–0.10–0.20–0.02
DD–0.05±0.390.00–0.150.05

UV: ultraviolet, TD: traditional resin dentures, AD: artificial teeth made of digital light processing, DD: denture base with artificial teeth made of digital light processing, SD: standard deviation, CI: confidence interval..


Table 2 . Results before and after UV type ultrasonic cleaner at various measurement points in three groups (n=10) (unit=%).

Measurement areaGroupp-value

TDADDD



Mean±SDMedianMean±SDMedianMean±SDMedian
ab–0.14±0.27–0.14–0.21±0.41–0.100.13±0.270.150.071
cd–0.14±0.19–0.150.07±0.37–0.100.03±0.160.000.245
ac–0.23±0.32–0.21–0.14±0.50–0.20–0.15±0.540.050.563
bd0.12±0.39–0.08–0.08±0.570.00–0.16±0.65–0.200.481
ad0.00±0.230.08–0.16±0.22–0.100.02±0.190.000.214
bc0.13±0.92–0.12–0.02±0.320.05–0.11±0.310.000.689

UV: ultraviolet, TD: traditional resin dentures, AD: artificial teeth made of digital light processing, DD: denture base with artificial teeth made of digital light processing, SD: standard deviation..


Stats or Metrics

Share this article on

  • line

Most KeyWord ?

What is Most Keyword?

  • It is most registrated keyword in articles at this journal during for 2 years.

Journal of Technologic Dentistry

eISSN 2288-5218
pISSN 1229-3954
qr-code Download