닫기

Ex) Article Title, Author, Keywords

Original Article

Split Viewer

Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46(2): 28-35

Published online June 30, 2024

https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.2.28

© Korean Academy of Dental Technology

DLP 프린터로 제작한 상악 및 하악 의치상의 항온수조 침적에 따른 진실도(trueness) 평가

김동연1, 이광영2

1경동대학교 치기공학과, 2원광보건대학교 치기공과

Received: June 4, 2024; Revised: June 15, 2024; Accepted: June 21, 2024

Evaluation of trueness of maxillary and mandibular denture bases produced with a DLP printer by immersion in a constant temperature water bath

Dong-Yeon Kim1 , Gwang-Young Lee2

1Department of Dental Technology, Kyungdong University, Wonju, Korea
2Department of Dental Laboratory Technology, Wonkwang Health Science University, Iksan, Korea

Correspondence to :
Gwang-Young Lee
Department of Dental Laboratory Technology, Wonkwang Health Science University, 514 Iksan-daero, Iksan 54538, Korea
E-mail: leegy@wu.ac.kr
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1826-6870

Received: June 4, 2024; Revised: June 15, 2024; Accepted: June 21, 2024

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the three-dimensional trueness of upper and lower denture bases produced using a digital light processing (DLP) printer and immersed in a constant-temperature water bath.
Methods: An edentulous model was prepared and fitted with denture bases and occlusal rims manufactured using base plate wax. After scanning the model, denture bases, and occlusal rims, complete denture designs were created. Using the designs and a DLP printer, 10 upper and 10 lower complete dentures were manufactured. Each denture was scanned before (impression surface of upper denture base before constant temperature water bath [UBC] and impression surface of lower denture base before constant temperature water bath [LBC] groups) and after (impression surface of upper denture base after constant temperature water bath [UAC] and impression surface of lower denture base after constant temperature water bath [LAC] groups) immersion in the constant-temperature water bath. Scanned files were analyzed by comparing reference and scanned data, with statistical analysis conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test (α=0.05).
Results: Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the UBC and LBC groups, nor between the UAC and LAC groups (p>0.05). However, significant differences were observed between the UBC and UAC groups and between the LBC and LAC groups, i.e., before and after the constant-temperature water bath for both maxillary and mandibular denture bases (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Denture bases not immersed in the constant-temperature water bath (UBC and LBC groups) exhibited error values within 100 μm, whereas those immersed in the water bath (UAC and LAC groups) showed error values exceeding 100 μm.

Keywords: Color difference map, Complete denture, Denture bases, Digital light processing, Three-dimensional printing, Trueness

Article

Original Article

Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46(2): 28-35

Published online June 30, 2024 https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.2.28

Copyright © Korean Academy of Dental Technology.

DLP 프린터로 제작한 상악 및 하악 의치상의 항온수조 침적에 따른 진실도(trueness) 평가

김동연1, 이광영2

1경동대학교 치기공학과, 2원광보건대학교 치기공과

Received: June 4, 2024; Revised: June 15, 2024; Accepted: June 21, 2024

Evaluation of trueness of maxillary and mandibular denture bases produced with a DLP printer by immersion in a constant temperature water bath

Dong-Yeon Kim1 , Gwang-Young Lee2

1Department of Dental Technology, Kyungdong University, Wonju, Korea
2Department of Dental Laboratory Technology, Wonkwang Health Science University, Iksan, Korea

Correspondence to:Gwang-Young Lee
Department of Dental Laboratory Technology, Wonkwang Health Science University, 514 Iksan-daero, Iksan 54538, Korea
E-mail: leegy@wu.ac.kr
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1826-6870

Received: June 4, 2024; Revised: June 15, 2024; Accepted: June 21, 2024

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the three-dimensional trueness of upper and lower denture bases produced using a digital light processing (DLP) printer and immersed in a constant-temperature water bath.
Methods: An edentulous model was prepared and fitted with denture bases and occlusal rims manufactured using base plate wax. After scanning the model, denture bases, and occlusal rims, complete denture designs were created. Using the designs and a DLP printer, 10 upper and 10 lower complete dentures were manufactured. Each denture was scanned before (impression surface of upper denture base before constant temperature water bath [UBC] and impression surface of lower denture base before constant temperature water bath [LBC] groups) and after (impression surface of upper denture base after constant temperature water bath [UAC] and impression surface of lower denture base after constant temperature water bath [LAC] groups) immersion in the constant-temperature water bath. Scanned files were analyzed by comparing reference and scanned data, with statistical analysis conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test (α=0.05).
Results: Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the UBC and LBC groups, nor between the UAC and LAC groups (p>0.05). However, significant differences were observed between the UBC and UAC groups and between the LBC and LAC groups, i.e., before and after the constant-temperature water bath for both maxillary and mandibular denture bases (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Denture bases not immersed in the constant-temperature water bath (UBC and LBC groups) exhibited error values within 100 μm, whereas those immersed in the water bath (UAC and LAC groups) showed error values exceeding 100 μm.

Keywords: Color difference map, Complete denture, Denture bases, Digital light processing, Three-dimensional printing, Trueness

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Research design process.
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46: 28-35https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.2.28

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Upper denture base manufactured using light-polymerization additive manufacturing.
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46: 28-35https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.2.28

Fig 3.

Figure 3.Mandibular denture base manufactured using light-polymerization additive manufacturing.
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46: 28-35https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.2.28

Fig 4.

Figure 4.Denture base impression surface scan.
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46: 28-35https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.2.28

Fig 5.

Figure 5.Immerse the upper and lower denture bases in a constant temperature water bath.
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46: 28-35https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.2.28

Fig 6.

Figure 6.Comparison of color differences between the UBC and UAC groups before and after immersion in a constant temperature water bath. (A) UBC, (B) UAC. UBC: impression surface of upper denture base before constant temperature water bath, UAC: impression surface of upper denture base after constant temperature water bath.
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46: 28-35https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.2.28

Fig 7.

Figure 7.Comparison of color differences between the LBC group and the LAC group before and after immersion in a constant temperature water bath. (A) LBC, (B) LAC. LBC: impression surface of lower denture base before constant temperature water bath, LAC: impression surface of lower denture base after constant temperature water bath.
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46: 28-35https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.2.28

Table 1 . 3D superimposed RMS analysis results of the upper and lower denture base impression surfaces before and after the constant temperature water bath (n=40) Unit=μm.

GroupMean±SDMedian95% CIp-value

MinMax
UBC89.6a±26.194.670.9108.20.001
LBC87.0a±4.185.984.090.0
UAC143.9b±30.2137.9122.3165.5
LAC170.4b±68.2142.5121.5219.2

3D: three-dimensional, RMS: root mean square, SD: standard deviation, CI: confidence interval, UBC: impression surface of upper denture base before constant temperature water bath, LBC: impression surface of lower denture base before constant temperature water bath, UAC: impression surface of upper denture base after constant temperature water bath, LAC: impression surface of lower denture base after constant temperature water bath..

a,bLetter of statistical post hoc analysis of nonparametric tests. The p-value was analyzed as (p=0.05/6=0.0083) using Bonferroni correction..


Stats or Metrics

Share this article on

  • line

Most KeyWord ?

What is Most Keyword?

  • It is most registrated keyword in articles at this journal during for 2 years.

Journal of Technologic Dentistry

eISSN 2288-5218
pISSN 1229-3954
qr-code Download