닫기

Ex) Article Title, Author, Keywords

Original Article

Split Viewer

Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46(3): 107-113

Published online September 30, 2024

https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.3.107

© Korean Academy of Dental Technology

새롭게 개발된 치과용 알루미나 세라믹 드레서의 입자 크기에 따른 연삭 마모 특성의 비교

박수철, 박종경

김천대학교 치기공학과

Received: August 31, 2024; Revised: September 9, 2024; Accepted: September 9, 2024

Comparison of abrasive wear characteristics according to particle size of newly developed dental alumina ceramic dressers

Soo-Chul Park , Jong-Kyoung Park

Department of Dental Technology, College of Health Care, Gimcheon University, Gimcheon, Korea

Correspondence to :
Jong-Kyoung Park
Department of Dental Technology, College of Health Care, Gimcheon University, 214 Daehak-ro, Gimcheon 39528, Korea
E-mail: jkpark@gimcheon.ac.kr
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7508-7823

Received: August 31, 2024; Revised: September 9, 2024; Accepted: September 9, 2024

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to develop dental alumina ceramic dressers, evaluate their abrasive wear characteristics based on particle size, and identify dental dressers with optimal particle size and performance.
Methods: Commercial ceramic dressers (n=5) were selected as the control group, whereas alumina ceramic dressers with 80-grit and 120-grit particles were fabricated as the experimental groups (n=5 each). Prepared specimens were assessed for surface roughness, wear resistance, and abrasiveness against a wear-inducing element (SUS304 stainless steel ball). Means and standard deviations were calculated for each test. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis H test with Bonferroni correction (α=0.05) via SPSS Statistics ver. 23.0 (IBM).
Results: Surface roughness was highest in the 80-grit group (22.734±1.308 μm), followed by 120-grit group (21.804±0.785 μm), and lowest in control group (15.782±0.223 μm). Wear resistance was greatest in 120-grit group (0.007±0.002 g), followed by the 80-grit group (0.007±0.004 g), and lowest in the control group (0.370±0.010 g). Furthermore, abrasiveness against the wear-inducing element (SUS304 stainless steel ball) was highest in 120-grit group (0.017±0.003 g), followed by the 80-grit group (0.015±0.003 g), and lowest in control group (0.010±0.001 g).
Conclusion: Based on the combined results of surface roughness, wear resistance, and abrasiveness against a wear-inducing element, the newly developed alumina ceramic dressers show promise for clinical application.

Keywords: Alumina ceramic, Dental equipment, Dental instruments, Materials testing, Particle size

Article

Original Article

Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46(3): 107-113

Published online September 30, 2024 https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.3.107

Copyright © Korean Academy of Dental Technology.

새롭게 개발된 치과용 알루미나 세라믹 드레서의 입자 크기에 따른 연삭 마모 특성의 비교

박수철, 박종경

김천대학교 치기공학과

Received: August 31, 2024; Revised: September 9, 2024; Accepted: September 9, 2024

Comparison of abrasive wear characteristics according to particle size of newly developed dental alumina ceramic dressers

Soo-Chul Park , Jong-Kyoung Park

Department of Dental Technology, College of Health Care, Gimcheon University, Gimcheon, Korea

Correspondence to:Jong-Kyoung Park
Department of Dental Technology, College of Health Care, Gimcheon University, 214 Daehak-ro, Gimcheon 39528, Korea
E-mail: jkpark@gimcheon.ac.kr
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7508-7823

Received: August 31, 2024; Revised: September 9, 2024; Accepted: September 9, 2024

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to develop dental alumina ceramic dressers, evaluate their abrasive wear characteristics based on particle size, and identify dental dressers with optimal particle size and performance.
Methods: Commercial ceramic dressers (n=5) were selected as the control group, whereas alumina ceramic dressers with 80-grit and 120-grit particles were fabricated as the experimental groups (n=5 each). Prepared specimens were assessed for surface roughness, wear resistance, and abrasiveness against a wear-inducing element (SUS304 stainless steel ball). Means and standard deviations were calculated for each test. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis H test with Bonferroni correction (α=0.05) via SPSS Statistics ver. 23.0 (IBM).
Results: Surface roughness was highest in the 80-grit group (22.734±1.308 μm), followed by 120-grit group (21.804±0.785 μm), and lowest in control group (15.782±0.223 μm). Wear resistance was greatest in 120-grit group (0.007±0.002 g), followed by the 80-grit group (0.007±0.004 g), and lowest in the control group (0.370±0.010 g). Furthermore, abrasiveness against the wear-inducing element (SUS304 stainless steel ball) was highest in 120-grit group (0.017±0.003 g), followed by the 80-grit group (0.015±0.003 g), and lowest in control group (0.010±0.001 g).
Conclusion: Based on the combined results of surface roughness, wear resistance, and abrasiveness against a wear-inducing element, the newly developed alumina ceramic dressers show promise for clinical application.

Keywords: Alumina ceramic, Dental equipment, Dental instruments, Materials testing, Particle size

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Dimension of specimen in this study.
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46: 107-113https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.3.107

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Sintering schedules used for the specimens.
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46: 107-113https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.3.107

Fig 3.

Figure 3.Stylus surface roughness tester (TalySurf PGI, Taylor Hobson).
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46: 107-113https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.3.107

Fig 4.

Figure 4.(A) Wear-inducing element (SUS304 stainless steel ball), (B) before wear test, and (C) conducting wear test.
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46: 107-113https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.3.107

Fig 5.

Figure 5.Results of surface roughness (Ra) of specimens. *Denotes a statistically significant difference between groups at the 0.05 level.
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46: 107-113https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.3.107

Fig 6.

Figure 6.Results of wear test of ceramic dresser specimens. *Denotes a statistically significant difference between groups at the 0.05 level.
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46: 107-113https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.3.107

Fig 7.

Figure 7.Results of wear test on the wear-inducing element (SUS304 stainless steel ball). *Denotes a statistically significant difference between groups at the 0.05 level.
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46: 107-113https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.3.107

Table 1 . Paste composition for specimen preparation in this study.

ComponentMaterialwt. (%)
AbrasiveWA63.4
BinderPotash feldspar31.1
Molding materialCMC5.5
Total100.0

WA: white aluminum oxide, CMC: carboxymethyl cellulose..


Table 2 . Conditions for wear test in this study.

Test specimenRotation speed (rpm)Load (kgf)TemperatureHumidity (%)Time (sec)Wear-inducing element
Ceramic dresser6015Room
temperature
50300∅12.7 mm
SUS304 stainless
steel ball

Stats or Metrics

Share this article on

  • line

Related articles in JTD

Most KeyWord ?

What is Most Keyword?

  • It is most registrated keyword in articles at this journal during for 2 years.

Journal of Technologic Dentistry

eISSN 2288-5218
pISSN 1229-3954
qr-code Download