Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46(3): 93-100
Published online September 30, 2024
https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.3.93
© Korean Academy of Dental Technology
배은정
부천대학교 치기공과
Department of Dental Technology, Bucheon University, Bucheon, Korea
Correspondence to :
Eun-Jeong Bae
Department of Dental Technology, Bucheon University, 56 Sosa-ro, Bucheon 14774, Korea
E-mail: baebae@bc.ac.kr
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3098-7673
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: This study aimed to generate virtual mandibular first molars using deep learning technology, specifically deep convolutional generative adversarial network (DCGAN), and evaluate the accuracy and reliability of these virtual teeth by analyzing their morphological characteristics. These morphological characteristics were classified based on various evaluation criteria, facilitating the assessment of deep learning-based dental prosthesis production’s practical applicability.
Methods: Based on our previous research, 1,000 virtual mandibular first molars were generated, and based on morphological criteria, categorized as matching, non-matching, and partially matching. The generated first molars or the categorization of the generated molars were analyzed through the expert judgment of dental technicians.
Results: Among the 1,000 generated virtual teeth, 143 (14.3%) met all five evaluation criteria, whereas 76 (7.6%) were judged as completely non-matching. The most frequent issue, with 781 (78.1%) instances, including some overlapping instances, was related to occlusal buccal cusp discrepancies.
Conclusion: The study reveals the potential of DCGAN-generated virtual teeth as substitutes for real teeth; however, additional research and improvements in data quality are necessary to enhance accuracy. Continued data collection and refinement of generation methods can maximize the practicality and utility of deep learning-based dental prosthesis production.
Keywords: Deep convolutional generative adversarial network, Deep learning, Dental prosthesis, Morphological analysis, Virtual teeth
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46(3): 93-100
Published online September 30, 2024 https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.3.93
Copyright © Korean Academy of Dental Technology.
배은정
부천대학교 치기공과
Department of Dental Technology, Bucheon University, Bucheon, Korea
Correspondence to:Eun-Jeong Bae
Department of Dental Technology, Bucheon University, 56 Sosa-ro, Bucheon 14774, Korea
E-mail: baebae@bc.ac.kr
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3098-7673
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: This study aimed to generate virtual mandibular first molars using deep learning technology, specifically deep convolutional generative adversarial network (DCGAN), and evaluate the accuracy and reliability of these virtual teeth by analyzing their morphological characteristics. These morphological characteristics were classified based on various evaluation criteria, facilitating the assessment of deep learning-based dental prosthesis production’s practical applicability.
Methods: Based on our previous research, 1,000 virtual mandibular first molars were generated, and based on morphological criteria, categorized as matching, non-matching, and partially matching. The generated first molars or the categorization of the generated molars were analyzed through the expert judgment of dental technicians.
Results: Among the 1,000 generated virtual teeth, 143 (14.3%) met all five evaluation criteria, whereas 76 (7.6%) were judged as completely non-matching. The most frequent issue, with 781 (78.1%) instances, including some overlapping instances, was related to occlusal buccal cusp discrepancies.
Conclusion: The study reveals the potential of DCGAN-generated virtual teeth as substitutes for real teeth; however, additional research and improvements in data quality are necessary to enhance accuracy. Continued data collection and refinement of generation methods can maximize the practicality and utility of deep learning-based dental prosthesis production.
Keywords: Deep convolutional generative adversarial network, Deep learning, Dental prosthesis, Morphological analysis, Virtual teeth
Table 1 . Virtual teeth determined to meet all criteria (refer to previous research).
Item | Classification | Criteria | Naming |
---|---|---|---|
No. of cusp | ① No. of buccal cusp | 3 ea | BC |
② No. of lingual cusp | 2 ea | LC | |
Occlusal surface ratio | ③ Buccal to lingual occlusal surface ratio based on the central groove | 3:2 | OBL |
④ Ratio of buccal cusp – Mesiobuccal cusp (5):Distobuccal cusp (3):Distal cusp (2) | 5:3:2 | OBC | |
⑤ Ratio of lingual cusp – Mesiolingual cusp (1):Distolingual cusp (1) | 1:1 | OLC |
Table 2 . The morphological classification results of virtual teeth.
Category | Number (%) |
---|---|
All match | 143 (14.3) |
All mismatch | 76 (7.6) |
Partial mismatch | 781 (78.1) |
Total | 1,000 (100.0) |
Table 3 . Detailed analysis results of partially mismatched items (multiple selections).
Category | Result number (%) | Detailed analysis (1) | Result (1) number (%) | Detailed analysis (2) | Result (2) number (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Partial mismatch | 781 (78.1) | BC mismatch | 409 (28.2) | ||
LC mismatch | 121 (8.3) | ||||
OBL mismatch | 4 (0.3) | ||||
OBC mismatch | 781 (53.8) | Size error of distobuccal cusp | 187 (23.9) | ||
Buccal cusp ratio error (symmetry) | 156 (20.0) | ||||
Four cusps | 103 (13.2) | ||||
Others | 335 (42.9) | ||||
Subtotal (2) | 1,562 (100.0) | ||||
OLC mismatch | 136 (9.4) | ||||
Subtotal (1) | 1,451 (100.0) |
BC: number of buccal cusp, LC: number of lingual cusp, OBL: buccal to lingual occlusal surface ratio based on the central groove, OBC: ratio of buccal cusp, OLC: ratio of lingual cusp..
Wook Tae Kim
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46(4): 197-202 https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.4.197Eun-Jeong Bae, Sun-Young Ihm
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2024; 46(2): 36-41 https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2024.46.2.36Ki-Baek Kim
Journal of Technologic Dentistry 2022; 44(4): 126-131 https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2022.44.4.126